Stylized green and purple 'G' with "Global Society of Online Literacy Educators" in purple.

GSOLE 2026 Conference Call for Proposals

Proposals due FRIDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2025

Quick Links


See Conference CFP as a full text document. Use the links below to navigate to different sections of the conference call-for-proposals:



Persistence in the Age of Disruption Conference Overview

2026 Conference Information

Theme: Persistence in the Age of Disruption: Celebrating a Decade of Collaborative Work in Online Literacy Education

Dates:  Asynchronous presentations will be available Wednesday, January 28, 20026; Synchronous presentations will take place Wednesday through Friday, February 4–6, 2026

Format: The conference will take place asynchronously via the GSOLE website and synchronously via Zoom. 


Questions for conference organizers? Email Kevin DePew at vice-president@gsole.org

The Global Society of Online Literacy Educators (GSOLE) invites proposals for its ninth annual online international conference. This event will be hosted online with the following schedule:

  • Synchronous presentations begin on Wednesday, February 4, and end on Friday, February 6, 2026 with recordings available to all registered attendees
  • Asynchronous presentations will be embedded as links in the conference program

Founded April 7, 2016, GSOLE was built on a commitment to improving online literacy instruction through research, collaboration, and inclusive practice. As GSOLE celebrates its 10th anniversary, we invite conference presenters and attendees to lean into collaboration, persistence, and OLI community as counterforces to polarization and instability in today's educational environment. In an era defined by technological upheaval, institutional precarity, and cultural fragmentation, working together across disciplines, institutions, and modalities remains both pedagogically effective and socially vital. 

This year’s theme, Persistence in the Age of Disruption, highlights how collaborative practices sustain our work, foster resilience, and build bridges in divided times. The global expansion of online education has revealed the fragility and promise of digital togetherness. Online literacy education in K–12 and higher education institutions can become sites of global solidarity, where persistence is collective and sustained by networks that transcend institutional and national boundaries.

We welcome proposals that explore how co‑teaching, cross‑institutional partnerships, global collaborations, curricular collaboration, collaboration in writing centers, student‑centered design, and other forms of collaboration can drive persistence, equity, and innovation in online and digitally enhanced learning environments.

This theme also invites reflection on the broader conditions shaping our work: political tensions influencing educational policies; the “demographic cliff” and other issues affecting the financial viability of educational institutions; the continued rise of generative AI; the precarity of graduate students and contingent faculty; and the ongoing struggle for accessibility and justice in online and digitally enhanced literacy contexts. We seek proposals that examine how educators are responding to disruption not in isolation, but through collective action, shared inquiry, and sustained dialogue.

As we mark this 10-year milestone, we also invite proposals that look forward and reflect on GSOLE’s evolution, its impact on the field, and the continued need for spaces where educators can share, question, and co‑create the future of online literacy education.

Topics of Interest

This list is not exhaustive. GSOLE wants to hear all voices. We invite questions and concerns to be addressed to Kevin DePew at vice-president@gsole.org.

Ideas that might guide proposals in these topics include (but are not limited to):

I. Effects of Disruption on Graduate Students and Contingent Instructors

  • What are strategies for fostering connection, collaboration, and sustained engagement in virtual graduate programs, particularly in the face of isolation or unforeseen challenges?
  • How can robust support networks and professional learning communities be built to counteract isolation and foster persistence among contingent instructors teaching online literacy courses?
  • How can we address unique pressures and burnout risks for graduate student instructors and contingent faculty teaching online literacy courses? What are strategies for sustainable practices?
  • What curriculum and professionalization initiatives can equip graduate students with the pedagogical and technological skills needed for successful online literacy instruction, recognizing the realities of the academic job market?
  • What are some accessible and relevant training options for contingent instructors to master new online pedagogies and AI tools, ensuring they are equipped for evolving teaching demands without additional burden?

II. Evolving Roles for Writing Programs and Writing Centers

  • How can writing programs address and respond to political pressures, censorship, and debates around curriculum and academic freedom, particularly in online spaces?
  • How is the role of writing instruction evolving? How can writing programs develop ethical and effective frameworks for incorporating AI into writing pedagogy, fostering critical AI literacy, and redefining the goals of writing instruction in the age of generative AI?
  • How can online writing centers adapt their services to address generative AI, promote ethical AI use, and support students in developing critical AI literacy?
  • How can writing programs develop flexible, adaptable, and engaging online writing courses that can withstand technological shifts and evolving student needs?
  • What are innovative approaches to evaluating student writing and literacy development when AI tools are readily available?
  • What are the evolving roles and responsibilities of Writing Program Administrators in navigating technological disruption, advocating for faculty, and ensuring program integrity?

III. Pedagogy that Considers Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA)

  • How can we create online literacy learning environments that foster respectful dialogue, critical engagement with diverse perspectives, and support for students from marginalized backgrounds amidst political tensions?
  • How can innovative educational technologies, including AI-powered tools, enhance accessibility for learners with diverse needs and disabilities?
  • How can we develop and implement online literacy practices that affirm and leverage students' linguistic, cultural, and experiential assets, fostering a sense of belonging and persistence for all learners?
  • What are some best practices for creating online learning environments and materials that are inherently accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities and diverse linguistic backgrounds?
  • What are some possible institutional and pedagogical approaches to mitigate disparities in access to technology, internet, and digital literacy resources, ensuring equitable participation for all students?
  • How can we adapt online teaching practices to support student well-being and persistence in the face of personal or societal disruptions?

IV. Generative AI as a Component of Online Literacy Instruction

  • What frameworks and initiatives can be developed to foster critical AI literacy across the university, addressing both the affordances and limitations of AI in academic contexts.
  • What are some innovative and ethical ways to integrate AI tools (e.g., grammar checkers, drafting aids, feedback systems) to support student access, writing, reading, and research processes?
  • How can we develop clear policies, pedagogical strategies, and ethical frameworks for addressing the use of generative AI in student work?
  • How can online literacy education equip students with the critical thinking, communication, and adaptability skills necessary to thrive in an increasingly AI-integrated professional landscape?

Presentation Format Options

Conference organizers welcome proposals for synchronous presentations and asynchronous presentations.

To foster deeper engagement and minimize scheduling conflicts, GSOLE 2026 will feature a non-competitive, single-stream format for synchronous presentations. Links to asynchronous presentations will be embedded in the conference program. All sessions will be accessible to all attendees.

As an international organization, we will do our best to accommodate reasonable presentation times for presenters from around the world.

Synchronous Presentation Options: Present Live During the Conference

Panel Proposals: We welcome 40-minute panel presentations (3–5 presenters).

Individual Paper Proposals: We welcome 15-minute individual presentations (placed on panels of 2 to 3 presenters clustered by topic).

On Demand (Asynchronous) Presentation Options: 5- to 10-minute Pre-Recorded Presentations

Individual/Panel Proposals: We welcome pre-recorded presentations of 5–10 minutes maximum length (1–3 presenters).

OLI Certification ePortfolio Tours: We welcome proposals for pre-recorded ePortfolio tours of 5–10 minutes from individuals who completed the GSOLE OLI Certification Program.

Praxis Post(er)s: We welcome proposals for videos of 3–5 minutes that demonstrate a particular teaching practice or assignment in the virtual classroom or during online tutoring sessions.

Video “Flash Memoir”: We welcome proposals for video narratives of 3–4 minutes. Please send proposals in the form of a 500-word script and a title of 60–70 characters. In this celebratory platform, GSOLE members will narrate a brief story about what GSOLE and the OLI Community have meant to them during this age of disruption. For this option, there is no requirement to draw on research. Think about the best ways to present the story, such as simply speaking into a web cam, using an accompanying slidedeck, creating an animated video (e.g., Powtoon, Canva, Lemonly), or a recording of a (scripted) collaborative Zoom call for a co-authored story.

Consultations also available upon request. Please note the time-length requirement on these formats, which is an important feature of presentation accessibility.

Submission Guidelines

Proposals should be prepared for anonymous review without authors' names and institutional affiliations in the abstract. Where applicable, use anonymous descriptors to discuss institutional contexts and presenters (e.g., “large two-year college”; “English department at state university”; “WPA”; “adjunct faculty member”; etc.).

NOTE: Please submit no more than two proposals total. If submitting two proposals, they should be of different presentation formats.

Conference proposal writers are welcome to use Generative AI technologies, such as Copilot and ChatGPT, to assist in developing their proposals. However, you are still responsible for assessing any AI-generated content for accuracy and relevance to the GSOLE community. You should ensure the final submission reflects your ideas and work. While disclosure of AI assistance is not required, proper citation methods, such as those suggested by MLA or APA, can be used where applicable.

The proposal form asks prospective presenters for the following information:

  • The type of presentation.
  • The presentation’s title: For panel proposals, prepare one panel title; individual presenters may have their own titles, which may appear in the abstract.
  • Presenter(s) name and affiliation: For panel proposals, list all presenters.
  • The contexts of literacy education: K-12, general education, two-year college, university, technical/professional online education, OLI in the disciplines, graduate education, educator professional development, tutoring center, OLI outside of the US, other.
  • An abstract for the presentation: The abstract is limited to 2800 characters (approximately 400 words). As noted above, omit identifying information in this section.
Those submitting an ePortfolio proposal should focus the abstract on what attendees will learn or gain from viewing your ePortfolio. This might include the types of artifacts you include, insight into OLI practice in your context, insight into your identity and experiences as an OLI practitioner, the specific ways your ePortfolio bridges theory and practice, etc. Please keep in mind your ePortfolio is being published in a public space, so you’ll want to ensure you are not violating copyright law or sharing student work without permission.
  • Identify which topics your presentation/panel discusses (select no more than two from the topic list above):

Click here to access the proposal form

Click here to access sample proposals 

Proposal Scoring Rubric

Proposals will be assessed on the following criteria:

Relevance

When evaluating this criterion, consider the following questions to make an assessment:

  • Does the proposal align with OLI and/or the idea of Persistence in the Age of Disruption? Is the proposal a good fit for our conference?
  • Does the proposal present ideas that are timely and relevant to current theory and practice of online literacy education?
  • Does the proposal have the potential to contribute to multiple literacy areas (writing, reading, digital)?
  • Does the proposal contextualize the work within the scholarly dialogue treating online literacy education? (Not required for GSOLE 10th Anniversary Flash Memoirs)

Contribution

When evaluating this criterion, consider the following questions to make an assessment:

Focus

When evaluating this criterion, consider the following questions to make an assessment:

  • Does the proposal have a clear focus?
  • Does the proposal sufficiently explain the approach to the topic or a presentation plan?
  • Taking into consideration the proposed format, is the planned presentation appropriate and feasible? (Individual Papers will be 15 minutes each on panels of three; Praxis Post(er)s will be 5-7 minute pre-recorded presentations.)

Click here if you would like to see samples of past conference proposals 

Privacy Policy | Contact Information  | Support Us| Join Us 

 Copyright © Global Society of Online Literacy Educators 2016-2023

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software
!webmaster account!