GSOLE 2027 Conference Call for Proposals |
Quick LinksUse the links below to navigate to different sections of the conference call-for-proposals: 2027 Conference InformationTheme: Beyond Engagement: Opening Doors and Building Community for the Future of Online Literacy Education Dates: Asynchronous presentations open Wednesday, January 27. Synchronous presentations will take place Wednesday through Friday, February 3-5, 2027 Format: The conference will take place asynchronously via the GSOLE website and synchronously via Zoom. Questions for conference organizers? Email Mary Lourdes Silva at vice-president@gsole.org |
|
2027 Conference InformationThe Global Society of Online Literacy Educators (GSOLE) invites proposals for its eleventh annual online international conference. This event will be hosted online with the following schedule:
This year’s theme, Beyond Engagement: Opening Doors and Building Community for the Future of Online Literacy Education, highlights the transformative potential of inclusive, community-focused approaches to online literacy education. The conference theme invites educators, researchers, administrators, and students to consider how digital learning environments can do more than provide access: they can open doors to meaningful participation, connection, and opportunity. “Beyond Engagement” challenges us to look beyond traditional evidence of engagement, such as screen time, course completion, or the number of forum responses, drafts, process logs, or reflection activities. Instead, it calls for learning experiences that support student well-being and care, cultivate belonging, increase learner agency and critical thinking, and promote collaborative participation and a shared purpose. The Community of Inquiry (Col) Framework offers a generative lens for this work, conceptualizing effective online learning as the interaction of three presences: social presence, the ability of students to participate as “real people”; cognitive presence, the iterative process of exploration, integration, and resolution; and teaching presence, the instructional design that make both cognitive and social presence possible (Cunningham et al., 2025). As Cunningham et al. argue, surface-level indicators of interaction are not sufficient for a class to feel like a real community of inquiry. It is critical to go beyond doing schoolwork and achieving measurable outcomes. Moreover, it is important to note that structural racism, discrimination, and other social, cultural, political, and economic inequities can limit students' access to course content, undermining their engagement before it has a chance to develop. To go beyond engagement, conference participants can integrate online writing instruction principles that center students’ well-being, civic engagement, and service to their communities. Participants are encouraged to explore practices that recognize learners’ diverse identities, experiences, abilities, languages, and goals while empowering them to shape their own educational journeys. GSOLE is proud to offer a fully online conference. This conference invites participants to explore how the online literacy education professional community can foster meaningful relationships, mutual support, and a shared sense of purpose across geographic, cultural, linguistic, and technological boundaries. One GSOLE member reported last year, “When it comes to doing online conferences, GSOLE has it figured out.” By approaching community building as an intentional and ongoing practice, our conference committee strives to design a conference experience in which every participant feels seen, valued, and connected, where learners and educators exchange knowledge, strengthen one another, and collectively shape the future of literacy education. |
This list is not exhaustive. GSOLE wants to hear all voices. We invite questions and concerns to be addressed to Mary Lourdes Silva at vice-president@gsole.org
Ideas that might guide proposals in these topics include (but are not limited to):
What tutoring practices help students feel emotionally supported and connected to a writing community, especially in asynchronous or text-based tutoring formats where relationship-building is harder to sustain?
What pedagogical practices help students develop agency and critical thinking in online literacy courses, beyond simply completing required tasks?
What does it look like to center student well-being and care as a legitimate goal of online writing instruction, rather than a secondary concern to course outcomes?
In what ways can faculty assist each other in creating a safe, supportive online environment, particularly for faculty who work predominantly in online spaces?
How might feelings of isolation affect students and/or faculty? What strategies can be used to reduce feelings of isolation in a rapidly evolving digital world?
What does a classroom community look like in online courses at this historical moment? What does it mean for us, and what does it mean to our students?
How can instructors design online writing courses that cultivate emotional engagement (belonging, motivation, and connection to community) rather than relying solely on behavioral and cognitive markers like screen time, forum responses, or completed drafts?
What does engagement and community look like online? And how can those expectations meet the varying needs of online learners?
What strategies can instructors teaching in online, hybrid, or digitally enhanced environments use to encourage engagement and community building?
In what ways do emerging technologies (e.g., generative AI, automated grading tools) open or close doors to engagement and community-building in online literacy instruction?
What tools, resources, and pedagogical theories have emerged with the rise of online education?
What does AI literacy mean for online literacy educators and students, and how can programs build it intentionally into curriculum and faculty development rather than responding to it ad hoc?
How does student and instructor use of generative AI affect social presence — the sense of interacting with "real people" — in online literacy spaces?
What can online writing programs do to directly address structural inequities (e.g., racism, discrimination, unequal access to technology) that limit engagement before it starts?
How do we provide robust, accessible educational experiences in an online capacity for students in rural, low-income, or marginalized communities?
What universal design and accessibility practices help online writing programs or faculty move from minimal compliance toward genuine inclusion of disabled students and faculty?
How can online literacy educators design for linguistic and cultural diversity, including multilingual writers, translingual practices, and international students, so that community-building doesn't default to a single linguistic or cultural norm?
How do we design online courses and centers to welcome writers and communicate learning expectations in these environments?
With the rise of fully online colleges and universities, how do fully online institutional spaces function as a location for student engagement, community building, and educational development?
What does mentoring look like for new and emerging faculty in online educational spaces?
How can online writing centers move beyond tracking session counts and satisfaction surveys to better understand whether tutoring sessions foster a genuine sense of belonging and confidence in student writers?
How can adjunct, part-time, and contingent faculty be more involved in the community?
How can tutors, staff, and managers be included in building a community in pedagogical spaces?
What does institutional investment in adjunct, part-time, and contingent faculty look like?
Questions about CCCC De-Chartering:
What needs did CCCC fill that have been lost by the de-chartering?
What does GSOLE envision for itself without the disciplinary and institutional structure CCCC provided?
What partnerships with other rhetoric, writing, literacy, or linguistics organizations could help fill the professional functions CCCC can no longer provide?
How can online literacy instruction as a field build a professional community in ways that are designed to welcome all OLI practitioners and scholars to the table?
How can institutions best prepare faculty members to teach online or hybrid courses?
Conference organizers welcome proposals for synchronous presentations and asynchronous presentations. As an international organization, we will do our best to accommodate reasonable presentation times for presenters from around the world.
As an international organization, we will do our best to accommodate reasonable presentation times for presenters from around the world.
Panel Proposals: We welcome 40-minute panel presentations (3–5 presenters).
Individual Paper Proposals: We welcome 15-minute individual presentations (placed on panels of 2 to 3 presenters clustered by topic).
OWI CCCC Proposals: We welcome all proposals already accepted by the CCCC (priority will be given to accepted proposals). For all individuals or panels who were not accepted by the CCCC, we encourage you to submit your proposals to any of the above options for review.
Individual/Panel Proposals: We welcome pre-recorded presentations of 5–10 minutes maximum length (1–3 presenters).
OLI Certification ePortfolio Tours: We welcome proposals for pre-recorded ePortfolio tours of 5–10 minutes from individuals who completed the GSOLE OLI Certification Program.
Praxis Post(er)s: We welcome proposals for videos of 3–5 minutes that demonstrate a particular teaching practice or assignment in the virtual classroom or during online tutoring sessions.
Consultations also available upon request. Please note the time-length requirement on these formats, which is an important feature of presentation accessibility.
Proposals should be prepared for anonymous review without authors' names and institutional affiliations in the abstract. Where applicable, use anonymous descriptors to discuss institutional contexts and presenters (e.g., “large two-year college”; “English department at state university”; “WPA”; “adjunct faculty member”; etc.).
NOTE: Please submit no more than two proposals total. If submitting two proposals, they should be of different presentation formats.
Conference proposal writers are welcome to use Generative AI technologies, such as Copilot and ChatGPT, to assist in developing their proposals. However, you are still responsible for assessing any AI-generated content for accuracy and relevance to the GSOLE community. You should ensure the final submission reflects your ideas and work. While disclosure of AI assistance is not required, proper citation methods, such as those suggested by MLA or APA, can be used where applicable.The proposal form asks prospective presenters for the following information:
Those submitting an ePortfolio proposal should focus the abstract on what attendees will learn or gain from viewing your ePortfolio. This might include the types of artifacts you include, insight into OLI practice in your context, insight into your identity and experiences as an OLI practitioner, the specific ways your ePortfolio bridges theory and practice, etc. Please keep in mind your ePortfolio is being published in a public space, so you’ll want to ensure you are not violating copyright law or sharing student work without permission.
Proposals will be assessed on the following criteria:
When evaluating this criterion, consider the following questions to make an assessment:
When evaluating this criterion, consider the following questions to make an assessment:
When evaluating this criterion, consider the following questions to make an assessment:
Click here if you would like to see samples of past conference proposals